Recently, astrophysicist Paul M. Sutter wrote spotted about a humbling experience. While reviewing a research paper, a colleague a basic error in his work. Sutter initially felt a wave of self-generated embarrassment—not because of the mistake itself, but because he realized he had been misusing AI in his workflow.
Yet, Sutter didn’t throw his hands up and abandon technology. He took the error as a lesson, adjusted how he used AI as a collaborative tool, and moved forward. The takeaway wasn’t that smart people don’t make mistakes; it was that the true value lies in what we do with the knowledge of a mistake.
When I used AI
My own recent experience with AI revealed a starkly different reaction from the world around me.
I had done some deep research, compiling statistics on military personnel and veteran counts since the Korean War, broken down into ten-year age increments starting in 2026 and moving backward. When I tried to share the compiled data, I was met with an unexpected question:
“Did you use AI to generate this?”
When I confirmed that I had, the response was swift and dismissive: “Well, that’s alright for you, but not a 16-year-old kid.”
Before I had navigated a severe bout with pneumonia after being treated for cancer—an experience that reframes how you look at time, judgment, and what genuinely matters—I might have simply absorbed that comment as a reprimand. I would have assumed I had done something wrong just by utilizing a modern tool which comes with some controversy, regardless of my age or experience.
Contempt Prior to Investigation
Today, however, I look at interactions like that and find myself asking entirely different questions:
- What? Are you going to read the report?
- And the answer: No, probably not.
The contrast between Sutter’s experience and my own is striking. In Sutter’s case, his colleague actually read the research, discovered the flaw, and sparked a genuine re-evaluation of methods and tools. Investigation led to growth and a new way of thinking.
In my case, the opposite happened. No investigation led to nothing at all—a textbook example of contempt prior to investigation.
I certainly felt the contempt. But looking past the dismissal, the lesson is clear: true evaluation requires looking at the actual work rather than knee-jerk assumptions about the tools used to build it. Innovation and collaboration aren’t about avoiding tools; they’re about integrity, curiosity, and doing the work to see what the output is actually worth.
How do you collaborate with someone that holds what you do in contempt?
Today, I know that you don’t.
One morning this past week I parked under my favorite tree (in Phoenix shade is a desirable thing – no matter the bird droppings). After pulling to the curb, I had to wait to exit the car as a homeless person passed by with his bed and belongings. It was 6:15 and he was headed in the general direction of St. Vinnie’s dining room on the Keys Campus for breakfast. I often see people headed in that direction at that time. There are other services available on the campus but not this early, so I always assume they are going to get something to eat.
This time of year, people with blankets are often seen but not usually a mattress. Later, after it gets warmer (than 60 at night) the blankets are left where used or on sidewalks and roadways. Shopping carts, such as this one, are common. Wheelchairs, baby buggies, and anything with wheels are used for transporting belongings. Alternately, Backpacks, handbags, shopping bags of all sizes and shapes are used. Sometimes an individual will have so much stuff that some is carried a block or more, sat down and then the previous load returned to. Single individuals are most common, but couples and other grouping may be seen.
Some people are on bicycles. Sometime the bicycles are towing grocery carts or child or pet carriers. I have seen as many as three carts being towed. On 10th Avenue where I park, the most common direction of foot and bicycle traffic is almost always south and east. Farther west, the more are going to the north or west. Over that way, those that slept in the shelter are headed to convenience stores or bus stops. At least those are my assumptions.
Unseen are the riders on DASH, the free bus route from downtown Phoenix. The Dash riders tend to be going away from the campus this time of day or maybe I just don’t notice them as much as the foot traffic. I also don’t notice the homeless living in vehicles as much this time of day. Usually, I arrive here just before or just after street parking becomes legal in this area at 6:00 am.
This area and Phoenix itself was much different in 1974 when I first drove through this area. I-10 had not yet reached Phoenix. Phoenix population was just over 600,000. The Central Arizona Shelter System now located on the Keys campus was not opened until 10 years later. The Phoenix Rescue Mission was located in an ex-hotel located just a little less a mile east of here at 4th Avenue and Washington. I-10 had not yet reached Phoenix, which was the reason I was driving through this area to my new job at Motorola in Scottsdale.
But the homeless were in this area even then. I saw them mostly in the afternoon on my way back home to my home in the far west valley. The distance was 33 miles one way and drive time was more or less 60 minutes. I liked using Washington Steet (one way going west) and Jefferson Street (one way going east). This meant I passed the Phoenix Carnegie Public Library building’s north side going home in the afternoon.
The Phoenix Carnegie Public Library was built in 1905 and is situated on two blocks between 10 th and 12 th Avenues and Washington and Jefferson streets. It is a hansom brick building with its name above the doorway on the north side. The land it sits on is green with gras and shade provided by the many olive and palm trees. It is now owned by the state of Arizona. In 1974 it was owned by the City of Phoenix. Since it was no longer a library a panel of wood had been placed over the word Library. “Park” had been written in white paint on the panel with a paint brush none too neatly. I laughed as I drove by in my 1966 VW beetle with the windows rolled down. You don’t drive in Phoenix with the windows up in August unless you have AC.
The homeless were enjoying the shade on the grass.
I was conscious of homelessness because just two weeks before I first drove by the “Park”, I had quit my job in the West Valley without having a another to go to. At the time I had four children and a wife that was a stay at home mother. We lived paycheck to paycheck.
Now I work at the Justa Center, across the street from the Carnegie Public Library. I see the homeless six days a week and I remember. But I don’t see them on the grass at the Carnegie Public Library grounds. The state of Arizona locked the gates